Re: RV: na'e entails na?

[Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>]

la .and cusku di'e
> I know that "na broda .ije ja`a go`i" is defined as a contradiction
> rather than a tautology, because "ja`a" substitutes for "na"
> rather than taking "na broda" within its scope.

I didn't know that "na broda .ije ja`a go`i" is defined as a contradiction.
Does this mean that "go'i" = "broda" in this case?

> But is the
> same true of NA`E? (I think you're right, but want confirmation.)

> >     .i .abu by. cy. na broda .ije na'ego'i

This would only be true if "go'i" = "broda", but I'm not sure that it is.  Very
confusing.

ni'oco'omi'e dn.