[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
De-emphasis particle
- To: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>,       Eric Raymond <eric@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>,       Eric Tiedemann <est@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
 
- Subject: De-emphasis particle
 
- From: John Cowan <cbmvax!snark.thyrsus.com!cowan>
 
- Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1992 15:04:21 EDT
 
- Reply-To: John Cowan <cbmvax!snark.thyrsus.com!cowan>
 
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!CUVMB.BITNET!pucc.Princeton.EDU!LOJBAN>
 
It was I who proposed the de-emphasis particle, and I now believe it was a
mistake to do so.  Based on Colin's Dagur commentary and Ivan's remarks,
I think we should rip this sucker from the language before it puts down
unwanted roots.
OTOH, I think that Colin's topicalization particle is also unnecessary.
The way to solve his problems is to assign a da-series particle in the
prenex and then use it in the main bridi:
	da voi cmavo zo'u mi djica le nu lei lobypli vimcu da
	x1 described-as a-cmavo : I desire the event-of the-mass-of
		Lojban-users remove x1
	As for this cmavo, I want us to remove it.
--
cowan@snark.thyrsus.com		...!uunet!cbmvax!snark!cowan
		e'osai ko sarji la lojban