rexmit

[Logical Language Group <lojbab@access.digex.net>]

>From MAILER-DAEMON Sat Sep 16 03:23:15 1995
Received: from localhost (localhost) by access4.digex.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with internal id DAA20111 ; for ; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 03:23:14 -0400
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 1995 03:23:14 -0400
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON>
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
Message-Id: <199509160723.DAA20111@access4.digex.net>
To: lojbab
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="DAA20111.811236194/access4.digex.net"
Status: R

This is a MIME-encapsulated message

--DAA20111.811236194/access4.digex.net

The original message was received at Sat, 16 Sep 1995 03:23:11 -0400
from lojbab@localhost

   ----- The following addresses had delivery problems -----
cown  (unrecoverable error)

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
550 cown... User unknown

   ----- Original message follows -----

--DAA20111.811236194/access4.digex.net
Content-Type: message/rfc822

Return-Path: lojbab
Received: (from lojbab@localhost) by access4.digex.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id DAA20108 ; for ; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 03:23:11 -0400
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 1995 03:23:11 -0400
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
Message-Id: <199509160723.DAA20108@access4.digex.net>
To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Subject: Re: why lojban
Cc: cown

I think Steven B. was suggesting among other thinsg that people do some
writing to show what hasn't changed since Loglan, in other words THAT is
the question.  Not a trivial one to answer in my book, and I am trying to
keep low key (not that I am getting much done anyway - start of school
year is getting me tied up too).

What happened to you or Chris or whoever was going to summarize LogFest and
get started on a lojbo karni news summary.  i think that is the best way
to start a status quo discussion.  And i am refusing to do it if only because
people made it clear that i should so refuse.  But this means that someone
else needs to come through.

lojbab

--DAA20111.811236194/access4.digex.net--