Re: TECH: Comparisons

[Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>]

I agree completely with Veijo's analysis.

I would also like to point out that:

>    (5) mi nelci maugi ti gi ta

hopefully some day can also be:

     *mi nelci ti (se)maubo ta

which would be the afterthought form of (5).


And something related to the sumti raising discussion:

>    (c) le ni mi nelci ti cu zmadu le ni mi nelci ta

I would like to know what is the answer to {zmadu fi ma} in (c).
Does (c) mean the same as:

        ti zmadu ta le ni mi nelci

?

Is there sumti raising going on somewhere?

Jorge