> Since the second "vu'o" involves a grammar change as well as a cmavo-list
> change, it makes most sense to change the first. A logical candidate is
> "bu'o", which is free and is very similar in form.
I remembered only the first {vu'o}, but I don't really care if it gets
renamed.
Does {re'u} stand any chance of being accepted as the ordinal ROI?
Jorge