[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Colin's relatives proposal
- To: John Cowan <cowan@snark.thyrsus.com>
- Subject: Re: Colin's relatives proposal
- From: cbmvax!snark!cowan
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1992 17:50:52 EDT
- Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was cbmvax!cowan@UUNET.UU.NET
- In-Reply-To: <9207101401.AA21066@relay1.UU.NET>; from "Mark E. Shoulson" at Jul 10, 92 9:47 am
- Reply-To: cbmvax!snark!cowan
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!pucc.princeton.edu!LOJBAN>
la mark. clsn. cusku di'e
> I the relatives definitiely need to be looked at, but at the risk of
> throwing a spanner into the works, where does the new cmavo {voi} fit in?
> Is it restrictive or incidental?
It is restrictive, and is to "poi" as "le" is to "lo".
--
cowan@snark.thyrsus.com ...!uunet!cbmvax!snark!cowan
e'osai ko sarji la lojban